★★★★★ 5
Good
Looks to be good quality. Easy install.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2025
ButtonPart number: USA4988299 Regular price: 13. 09 Availability: Out of Stock Made by: Frigidaire Manufacturer's Part Number: 137032100 Description Button USA4988299 Replacement Reference and Model Information Part Number 137032100 1483159, AH2349390, EA2349390, PS2349390, AP4368597 Manufacturer Model Number Description Electrolux EIFLS55IIW0 WASHER Electrolux EIFLS55IIW1 WASHER, FRONT LOAD Electrolux EIFLS55IMB0 WASHER Electrolux EIFLS55IMB1 WASHER, FRONT
Quick Dispatch:
Your Button orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Button ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Button, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Button in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1190 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
It’s just an air filter
Size: CA12290-Premium
It’s exactly how it’s pictured. Not sure what else to say it’s an air filter. I guess it’s doing its job
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good price
Size: CA12290-Premium
Fit as expected
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very good filter
Size: CA12290-Premium
Very good filter
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 3, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Not 99.9 %
Size: CA12290-Premium
Only 98% efficient. Says 99.9 in the ad. There is a huge difference between those two efficiencies.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2026
